From owner-freebsd-sparc Thu Jan 20 16:37:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from fdy2.demon.co.uk (fdy2.demon.co.uk [194.222.102.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737C21544F for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:37:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rjs@fdy2.demon.co.uk) Received: (from rjs@localhost) by fdy2.demon.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA00461; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:37:36 GMT (envelope-from rjs) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:37:36 GMT Message-Id: <200001202337.XAA00461@fdy2.demon.co.uk> From: Robert Swindells To: obrien@nuxi.com Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <20000119161816.G80628@relay.nuxi.com> (obrien@nuxi.com) Subject: Re: Sparc Port -- sounds good to me Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David O'Brien wrote: >On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 09:58:32PM +0000, Robert Swindells wrote: >> I already run it on a StrongARM system and was planning on using the same >> source tree for my SS2. >I possibly more worth-while thing to do would be to port the StrongARM. >I have a DNARD on loan to look at the toolchain issues if I get bored. >IMHO, I think the embedded market would really take to FreeBSD if we ran >on the StrongARM. This is why I bought my StrongARM system. The SS2 is being replaced as a CAD system at work by an NT system, I just didn't want to see it end up in a dumpster. I'll admit I haven't done much other than work on the ELF headers to date, but we are starting on a SA1110/SA1111 product at work & I intend to run *BSD on it in some form. Robert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message