From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 19 23:16:20 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF6816A419 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=050c7b3f6254414c5f5c69b958cc172620b9db89=401=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:14:3::6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6169F13C45B for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=050c7b3f6254414c5f5c69b958cc172620b9db89=401=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id YAY48911; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:57:11 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 4691D45076; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:57:11 -0700 (PDT) To: Mark Andrews In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:54:00 +1000." <200707180654.l6I6s0d7049258@drugs.dv.isc.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:57:11 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20070719195711.4691D45076@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Volker , "Heiko Wundram \(Beenic\)" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD violates RFC2870 [was: Re: Problems with named default configuration in 6-STABLE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:16:21 -0000 > From: Mark Andrews > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:54:00 +1000 > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Volker wrote: > > > As I think having a default to hint root zone is better, I'll file a > > > PR about that. > > > > Which leads me to ask: > > > > Why hasn't anyone recommended using stub zones for this? It seems the > > goal is to cache NS records from the rootservers, and stub zones don't > > utilise AXFR/IXFR. > > Because a root server (stealth slave) can generate the NXDOMAIN > responses locally. This really is a big win for ISP's where > there are lots of leaked queries for private tlds, IPv4 addresses > etc. > > Whether there is a benefit for everyone is still open to debate. > > Mark > > > -- > > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | > > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >