From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 11 20:04:01 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502F316A402
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:04:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com)
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AF943D72
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:03:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com)
Received: from frontend2.internal (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151])
	by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870CBD47C3E
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:03:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.152])
	by frontend2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:03:32 -0400
X-Sasl-enc: xhTCJVX0GoSPdMEhOaZKcsTTyYFYSMZ1WwO4zWGGKrPD 1144785798
Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk
	(bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128])
	by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63D14499
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:03:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:03:34 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <443B8754.4000008@locolomo.org>
	<200604111339.28940.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
	<443BC6E1.20604@locolomo.org>
In-Reply-To: <443BC6E1.20604@locolomo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200604112103.35808.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
Subject: Re: Solved (I hope): Toggling port dependencies
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:04:01 -0000

On Tuesday 11 April 2006 16:10, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 April 2006 13:25, RW wrote:
> >> You could try  setting USE_OPENLDAP_VER=23 for the port.
> >
> > Actually, I see it conflict with 2.2, so it must be set globally.
>
> Yes, OpenLDAP 2.3 conflicts with 2.2, but jabberd by default assumes 2.2
> so the build fails. Then rather than downgrading OpenLDAP since 2.3 is
> the recommended I'd prefer to force jabberd to build against 2.3.
>
> I've seen many ports doing this, for example squid. Some announces how
> to select a particular version. I don't know if your hint work with all
> ports.

Actually I think I got this wrong; USE_OPENLDAP_VER will create spurious LDAP 
dependencies if set globally. It should have been 

WANT_OPENLDAP_VER=23 

Dependencies on OpenLDAP are handled by  the common ports makefiles. jabberd 
doesn't specify a version.  I think it simply defaults to 2.2, even if 2.3 is 
installed.