From owner-freebsd-new-bus  Sat Jul 22 16:30:45 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-new-bus@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778FD37B569
	for <new-bus@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 16:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12473;
	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 17:30:40 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA14069; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 17:30:29 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200007222330.RAA14069@harmony.village.org>
Subject: Re: newbus replacement for kvtop() 
To: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer), new-bus@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jul 2000 17:26:09 MDT."
		<200007222326.RAA14043@harmony.village.org> 
References: <200007222326.RAA14043@harmony.village.org>  <20000722175112.A16931@cichlids.cichlids.com> 
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 17:30:29 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-new-bus@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'd go even a step further and say that you should use the bus_space
routines rather than calling bus_get_virtual() to access memory in the 
bus_space.  This is a bigger change, I think, because we access them
right now by dereferencing directly or indirectly with bcopy.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-new-bus" in the body of the message