Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:47:56 +0200
From:      "Cyrille Lefevre" <clefevre-lists@9online.fr>
To:        "Garrett Wollman" <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ps enhencements (posix syntax, and more)
Message-ID:  <01a001c428c4$3c9fe770$7890a8c0@dyndns.org>
References:  <019601c426b0$77dc91a0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org><p0602040dbcab0fdc78a2@[128.113.24.47]><1082504719.3444.534.camel@cube><00ba01c427f3$b3477f40$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> <200404212301.i3LN1PGd058705@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
repost due to RBL...

"Garrett Wollman" <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
> <<On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:54:51 +0200, "Cyrille Lefevre" <root@gits.dyndns.org>
said:
>
> > free letters, are : BDEFIJKQRVWYbukq, well K and k are reserved
> > for future use... so, why now -qQ ? do you have any better suggestion ?
>
> POSIX officially reserves -W for implementation use in all utilities.

thanks, so, -q and -Q would have to become something like -W posix and such...

Cyrille Lefevre.
-- 
mailto:clefevre-lists@9online.fr



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01a001c428c4$3c9fe770$7890a8c0>