From owner-freebsd-multimedia Thu Oct 21 1:11:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [12.9.219.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A4514E8F for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:11:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Received: from HARLIE.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [12.9.219.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA21079; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:11:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:11:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" To: Amancio Hasty Cc: Nate Williams , van.woerkom@netcologne.de, conrads@home.com, aa8vb@ipass.net, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: flashplugin In-Reply-To: <199910210221.TAA15266@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > JMF applications on windows fly --- I used to watch two or three mpeg > movies on my "trash" PIII 450 box . Trash box because is where I just swap OSes > and do whatever I want with the system . The player which I was > using http://www.burst.com is written purely in Java and I know because I used > to work for them. Was this using a "native" JMF, Sun's pure Java JMF, or none of the above? Depending on what the application was doing, it may have been spending most of its time in the JMF itself. Not trying to be argumenative, I've never seen the performance of the pure Java JMF. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message