From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 06:38:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0803316A4B3; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE82C43F75; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298D466E5A; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05999B72; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:38:55 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Hye-Shik Chang , ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20031011133855.GA953@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Adding CONFLICTS to ports (Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/zodb3 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 13:38:58 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:44:27AM -0700, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > perky 2003/10/11 04:44:27 PDT >=20 > FreeBSD ports repository >=20 > Modified files: > databases/zodb3 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist=20 > Log: > - Update to 3.2. > - Assign maintainership to me. > - Add an CONFLICTS entry against zodb-1*. A lot of people seem to be adding CONFLICTS entries to their ports lately, which is a good thing, but only if they're added to _all_ of the conflicting ports. In this case, the zodb port also needs a corresponding directive so that it conflicts with zodb3. Is there some other reason that people aren't doing this? Kris --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/iAfvWry0BWjoQKURAvINAJwOugw8lsdZ/UxLYyxJ+UZmHjf2aQCgy3AR g1bif6lKV+8r7lbWhyHBh6k= =CEpM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--