From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 20:38:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ADA106564A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BF98FC16 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD69D23C04 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:38:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1E2D23C03 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:38:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usbctlt011.secnap.com (10.70.2.19) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:38:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4FCE6E5A.3060608@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:38:50 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <83CBBA79D0DFC4FC169FE479@localhost> <20120605164704.GL5335@home.opsec.eu> <2E53A84FF48A4E713F306601@localhost> In-Reply-To: <2E53A84FF48A4E713F306601@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Any news on Suhosin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:38:58 -0000 On 6/5/12 4:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> It was never included in the PHP distribution. >> php distribution, as in php.net your example was for a FreeBSD port. Yes, our ports are a lot more functional and safe than distribution, more options, easier to use.. But the world doesn't have the advantage FreeBSD has. :-) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell