Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:17:01 -0700 From: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> To: Rick Olson <rick@napalmriot.com> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> Subject: Re: awk question Message-ID: <20070410231701.GA35246@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <461AEE3F.2010107@napalmriot.com> References: <20070306003506.GA12553@thought.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20070306072709.02577448@mail.computinginnovations.com> <20070306165349.GA67829@thought.org> <461AEE3F.2010107@napalmriot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:54:07PM -0700, Rick Olson wrote:
> I'm assuming you've already taken care of this, but to answer your
> original question in AWK form, you could have done the following:
>
> ls -l | awk '$8 == 2006 {system("rm " $9)}'
>
i'Ll save your snippet to my growing %%% awk file in my ~/HowTo,
thankee much. I'm in the first stages on a months-long trial on
system tuning. This, before I'd risk publishing anything. So
far tho, by upping and lower the NICE prio of various binaries, I
have been able to get more than 70% efficient use out of my older
servers. ---This *ought* to carry over to my faster machines....
Is tthere a way of using ps -alx | ask to look at nice and if it
is non-zero (the default), to reset it to zero?
Say that I've reniced xorg and mozilla to -9 for starters and
reniced epiphany to -11. Others may have a much lower NICE of
19. I don't know ask that well; is this on better left to
something like C? :-) [[[ Something I can do?? :-) ]]]
thanks in advance,
gary
>
--
Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070410231701.GA35246>