From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri May 26 16:18:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAD6D8303B for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6F81BCA for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B8C3ED8303A; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8651D83037 for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EED1BC8; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1dEHwP-000HWZ-NZ; Fri, 26 May 2017 18:18:17 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 18:18:17 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Bryan Drewery Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: (head users) 64-bit inodes: Packages heads up and Poudriere errors Message-ID: <20170526161817.GD43031@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 16:18:15 -0000 Hi! > For those running FreeBSD head, the ABI was majorly changed in r318736 > for 64-bit inodes. This change was *backwards compatible* but not > *forward compatible*. This is normal and expected. Is any fall-out from this change already handled or is it wise to wait a few more days ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !