From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 02:10:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C1437B418 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 02:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net [81.16.160.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF25443F75 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 02:10:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@hasta.se) Received: from [192.168.15.54] (helo=klementin) by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 19oJYJ-000IYt-Vf; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:10:19 +0200 From: "Matt Douhan" To: "Eriq Lamar" , Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200308161810.38287.eqe@cox.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: SV: when should 5.x be stable enough for web servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 09:10:24 -0000 >-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >Fran: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > >On i386 hardware and two processors amd mp. should I wait for 5.2. We have been using for some time, we use -CURRENT as FireWalls and as webservers, we have half our production split between STABLE and -CURRENT machines, so that if/when we hit a -CURRENT bug we simply rely on the STABLE machines to handle the load until -CURRENT gets fixed. Rgds Matt www.fruitsalad.org