From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 23:58:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA6337B401 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from white.imgsrc.co.jp (ns.imgsrc.co.jp [210.226.20.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6DC43F3F for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:58:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E480C4256 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:58:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2::130]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409384255 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:58:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2::130]) by black.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D5D1E4643 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:58:22 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:58:21 +0900 Message-ID: <7mn0gqh10y.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> From: Jun Kuriyama To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030610064507.GA22617@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <200306091636.h59GavDW043030@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030609195142.U581@korben.in.tern> <20030610064507.GA22617@fit.vutbr.cz> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 5.1 Released! X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 06:58:25 -0000 At Tue, 10 Jun 2003 08:45:07 +0200, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > The problem with an automatic update of permissions by cvsup is that > there were massive data updates on ftp-master (including new round of > packages-4-stable) and there is still one update cvsup run since > 2003-06-08 15:00:00 CEST (now I have 2003-06-10 08:38:27 CEST). > Furthermore, it seems to me that ftp-master is really overloaded, > because I have seen several "Inactivity timeout" (so I afraid about > huge swapping) and "Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded; try > again later" on the client side. Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to > check the server side. I got same results between ftp-master and ftp-master. I'm tracking this down, but I don't have exact reason yet. When I'm looking top(1) status, sometimes cvsupd process has 600MB over memory size. It's strange because usually cvsupd requires 10KB - 30KB. Over 600MB is not permanent. Such process has little memory in another time. Hmm... "Access limit exceeded" after "Inactivity timeout" may be what you guessed. When I got "Inactivity timeout", client process has died, but server process is still remain on ftp-master. After some minutes, it died. And then I can connect again. -- Jun Kuriyama // IMG SRC, Inc.