Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:42:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Message-ID: <1350229337390-5751929.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20121014152131.GA57720@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com> <1350153522261-5751733.post@n5.nabble.com> <5079DCCE.4020901@FreeBSD.org> <1350202187139-5751862.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121014152131.GA57720@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I do not loathe ULE, but I also do not use ULE. Maybe my wording wasn't exactly suitable, but that was the point I was trying to make. ULE is default for quite some time (and boasted impressive benchmarks upon introduction too), yet in reality 4BSD is far from being superseded for many. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Re-new-DragonFly-3-2-scheduler-and-PostgreSQL-comparision-with-FreeBSD-9-1-RC1-tp5751589p5751929.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1350229337390-5751929.post>