From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 3 17:34:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from quackerjack.cc.vt.edu (quackerjack.cc.vt.edu [198.82.160.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B654314CD1 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 17:34:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jobaldwi@vt.edu) Received: from sable.cc.vt.edu (sable.cc.vt.edu [128.173.16.30]) by quackerjack.cc.vt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA02670; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 20:34:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from john.baldwin.cx (jobaldwi.campus.vt.edu [198.82.67.146]) by sable.cc.vt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA02063; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 20:34:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199909040034.UAA02063@sable.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <976.936371894@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 20:34:22 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Tony Finch Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 03-Sep-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Perhaps the objections were raised because I didn't say I wanted to > sandbox Sendmail. I've looked through my sent mail and I can see that > I > didn't say anything about it in my initial mail. That's unfortunate. If you sandbox sendmail, then it makes sense that sendmail will need a user to be sandboxed in. In that case, adding a new user/group is acceptable. It was the adding a new user/group just for the sake of adding a new user/group that bothered many of us. ;) > Ciao, > Sheldon. --- John Baldwin -- http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message