From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 11 22:57:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dante.naver.co.id (unknown [202.155.86.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1683137B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by dante.naver.co.id (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09E281CB4AB; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:57:52 +0700 (JAVT) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:57:49 +0700 From: John Indra To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is -CURRENT in bad shape? Message-ID: <20010212135748.A9535@office.naver.co.id> Mail-Followup-To: Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010212132036.A58094@office.naver.co.id> <20010211223956.X3274@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010211223956.X3274@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:39:56PM -0800 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:39:56PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >Current from Sat Feb 10 17:00:18 looks ok, there were just some >patches to the scheduler but no one has complained yet. Let us >know. :) Thanks for the fast reply. I really need it. OK... buildworld seems to be running ok right now. I'll let you know if something goes wrong, of course... ;) BTW, today I saw post from John Baldwin to remove device random from the kernel config. Then, other post replied that this is a good thing, mpg123 playing went a lot better for him, well at least, that's what he said. If this is so, then why is there a device random line in GENERIC kernel? Do we really need device random? Thanks... >-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] /john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message