From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 22 21:33:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B6A37B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3421C43F85
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kirk@strauser.com)
Received: from pooh.honeypot.net.strauser.com (kirk@pooh.honeypot.net
	[10.0.5.128])
	by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6N4XkFl047686
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:33:46 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from kirk@strauser.com)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <8AE4DA75-BCC1-11D7-9DA1-000A957FF666@pacbell.net>
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:33:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8AE4DA75-BCC1-11D7-9DA1-000A957FF666@pacbell.net> (Tony
 Sterrett's message of "Tue, 22 Jul 2003 20:55:47 -0700")
Message-ID: <87d6g1zwt7.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Subject: Re: BIND 9
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 04:33:49 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 2003-07-23T03:55:47Z, Tony Sterrett <tonyste@pacbell.net> writes:

> I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
> machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable=3D"YES"
> and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I will
> In rc.local and it would use the config files in /etc/named/slave. Does
> this seems ok? Is there a better way.

This seems to come up every now and then.  Before we start, is there any
reason you want to have two seperate named process running, instead of
having one process serving as master to some domains and slave to others?
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/HhAp5sRg+Y0CpvERAilWAKClkBDiS7Ht0gLW0Kr+IGl8TtsyrwCfftvm
NbRONEKFd7oHYPrtwiaBOCg=
=R/8R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--