From owner-freebsd-smp Sun Apr 19 11:16:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA07501 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pluto.plutotech.com (mail.plutotech.com [206.168.67.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA07473 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 18:16:33 GMT (envelope-from gibbs@plutotech.com) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by pluto.plutotech.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA06451; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 12:16:16 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199804191816.MAA06451@pluto.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Tor Egge cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP Problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Apr 1998 19:20:17 +0200." <199804191720.TAA03652@pat.idi.ntnu.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 12:12:27 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >It might be reasonable to ignore the polarity/trigger-mode values in >the MP table if the APIC interrupt pin number corresponds to the >ISA/EISA interrupt number, since ISA/EISA interrupts are active-high >edge triggered interrupts when reaching the IOAPIC. The EISA spec allows level sensitive interrupts. Is this not the case for SMP systems? Seems strange. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message