From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Feb 18 21:47:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from smtp10.phx.gblx.net (smtp10.phx.gblx.net [206.165.6.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B1C37B491 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 21:47:29 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp10.phx.gblx.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA76654; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:47:00 -0700 Received: from usr05.primenet.com(206.165.6.205) via SMTP by smtp10.phx.gblx.net, id smtpdKtHjMa; Sun Feb 18 22:46:57 2001 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA12829; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:47:24 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com> Subject: DJBDNS vs. BIND To: josb@cncdsl.com Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 05:47:24 +0000 (GMT) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20010217161833.D54688@lizzy.bugworks.com> from "Jos Backus" at Feb 17, 2001 04:18:33 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Please don't. DJBDNS lacks significant and important functionality > > for all but trivial (one controller or single zone) uses. > > Maybe you should tell Dan what functionality you think is missing, and see > what he says. There are very good reasons behind djbdns's current feature set. I think the license is a show stopper, anyway. Somwthing so basic has got to be locally hackable, and the hacked code has got to be distributable. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message