From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jan 16 7:55:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0C337B400 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 07:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA24526; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:54:34 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020116085240.01c9e3e0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:54:28 -0700 To: Francisco Reyes , "'emailrob' spellberg" From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: FreeBSDmall vs Daemonnews mall Cc: FreeBSD Chat List In-Reply-To: <20020116105031.X19885-100000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <3C459893.44485DA3@emailrob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 08:51 AM 1/16/2002, Francisco Reyes wrote: >What do you mean by non-profit arm? Are you talking about the foundation? >They have nothing to do with the mall or vice-versa. The foundation >doesn't even own the trademark for FreeBSD. This is something that should be corrected immediately. In November of 2000, at BSDCon in Monterey, it was announced that the trademark would be transferred immediately. Why was that promise broken? If one of several competing vendors owns the trademark, it unfairly tilts the playing field. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message