Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Jun 1997 17:40:08 -0500
From:      Tom Jackson <toj@gorilla.net>
To:        jim@jaguNET.com
Cc:        Howard Lew <hlew@www2.shoppersnet.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, jim@jaquNET.com
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD-2.2-STABLE and Conner TR4 HyperQIC
Message-ID:  <19970613174008.46666@peeper.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <199706101759.NAA11141@devsys.jaguNET.com>; from Jim Jagielski on Tue, Jun 10, 1997 at 01:59:20PM -0400
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.970610100807.23498B-100000@www2.shoppersnet.com> <199706101759.NAA11141@devsys.jaguNET.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 10, 1997 at 01:59:20PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Howard Lew wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 1997, Tom Jackson wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, May 29, 1997 at 06:00:08PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > > Awhile ago I had posted that I would test out a new Conner HyperQIC/
> > > > Travan4 tape SCSI tape drive under FreeBSD-2.2-STABLE. I installed
> > > > it on Monday and have spent the last few days putting it through
> > > > it's paces. It was tested on a Adaptec 2940 and 1522B.
> > > > 
> > > > The Good News: It works solidly and reliably with no changes
> > > >  required to the kernel.
> > > > The Bad News: It ain't that fast.
> > > > 
> > 
> > Yes, the speed is what I don't like about those Travan devices... and
> > don't ever make the mistake of getting the 4 Gig (2.2 uncompressed) Media
> > because it holds so much and then deciding to format it because you will
> > be surprised how long it takes to complete that task. 
> > 
> 
> Nah... just start the format when you leave the office on Friday
> and it might be done by Monday morning :)
> 
Well, this will be my last post on this thread. I had mentioned some
concern about the reported density from the Conner/Seagate with TR4
of 0x45. This does not seem to be a problem, but is still not documented.

Complete backup of about 4gb went flawlessly. One little thing was the
comment in the handbook about doing a `mt fsf 1' at the first of the virgin
tape. This causes restore from the first file to be at vol 2 ( you don't
need to do this with tr4 tapes).

As far as the speed issue. I'm coming from a Colorado Jumbo 250, so this
tape drive seems a speed demon to me ;-> My backups went from 261 kb/s to
831 kb/s as reported by dump. According to the handbook, the 4mm 8mm dats
run from about 250 to 500 kb/s. I have no experience with a dat but the
this seems fairly six to half a dozen. I'm not sure why one would want to
format the cartridge (in dos I assume). I guess if you really screwed-up
the cartridge, then maybe then. I haven't even installed the dos/w31 s/w.

Anyway, I really like the tape drive. Tradeoffs between expensive tr4 carts
and short head and tape life with dats I will leave to the bean counters.

two taas to you all,

Tom



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970613174008.46666>