From owner-cvs-all  Tue May 21  1:29:29 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [216.254.138.122])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0E0D637B40B; Tue, 21 May 2002 01:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mike@localhost)
	by espresso.q9media.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4L8RtW78844;
	Tue, 21 May 2002 04:27:55 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mike)
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 04:27:55 -0400
From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/elf2aout elf2aout.c
Message-ID: <20020521042755.B56179@espresso.q9media.com>
References: <200205200756.g4K7ueM28492@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020520125748.E8089@espresso.q9media.com> <20020521074034.GB53675@sunbay.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020521074034.GB53675@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:40:34AM +0300
Organization: The FreeBSD Project
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:57:48PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > ru          2002/05/20 00:56:40 PDT
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     usr.bin/elf2aout     elf2aout.c 
> > >   Log:
> > >   s/u_int/u_int32_t/
> > >   
> > >   Revision  Changes    Path
> > >   1.3       +9 -8      src/usr.bin/elf2aout/elf2aout.c
> > 
> > Can we take this a step further and use the proper spelling:
> > s/u_int32_t/uint32_t/
> > 
> You'll have to fix <sys/elf32.h> first.  Also make sure this
> still can be bootstrapped from the old versions.

Well it looks like the structure you changed is for aout information,
so I don't see how <sys/elf32.h> would be significant.  But even if it
were, u_int32_t and uint32_t will always be compatible with each
other.  The only difference being that the latter is portable, which
is a positive attribute for cross-tools.

Best regards,
Mike Barcroft

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message