From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Oct 27  9:46:21 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4922037B479; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e9RGkD502333;
	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:46:13 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, developers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP!  MFC's
Message-ID: <20001027094613.E28123@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <20001027184107.T5433@lucifer.bart.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
In-Reply-To: <20001027184107.T5433@lucifer.bart.nl>; from jruigrok@via-net-works.nl on Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:41:07PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> [001027 09:41] wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Short: if you value stability, please be careful updating any mission
> critical system for the coming few days.

If you consider anything as a possible regression for stable users
then I urge you to not even consider MFC'ing.

-stable is not meant to be a snapshot of -current, it's supposed
to be _stable_ as the name implies.

Be tread lightly because _I_ carry a large stick.

thanks,
-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message