From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 06:14:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B44516A4D5 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:14:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108D043D39 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:14:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B01B214729; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:14:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:14:06 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Christian Weisgerber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:14:07 -0000 On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > I also keep running into ports where MAINTAINER and pkg-descr are > out of sync. IMHO that's the best rationale for leaving it out of pkg-descr from now on. It's quite common. mcl