From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Apr  6 12:47:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA15455
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 12:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA15440
          for <freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 12:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0u5etB-0003wHC; Sat, 6 Apr 96 12:47 PST
Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA04587; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 20:47:18 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
cc: paul@netcraft.co.uk, freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sup/cvs tags 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Apr 1996 09:40:43 MST."
             <199604061640.JAA21818@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1996 20:47:17 +0000
Message-ID: <4585.828823637@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I agree. The  FreeBSD cvs tree isn't for personal development and I'm
> > a bit miffed that Garret has been allowed to get away with putting in
> > a personal tag.
> 
> I disagree.  I think we don't use the full capabilities of CVS, and just
> because it might be painful for folks on slow links (and *NO* one has a

Maybe the right thing to do would be to make a branch for all core-members
(and other significant developers) once and for all...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.