From owner-freebsd-fs Sun Sep 12 13:30:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [63.67.141.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ACF1548B for ; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 13:30:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04069; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 16:29:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 16:29:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Bernd Walter Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone working on HSM? In-Reply-To: <19990912215419.A38366@cicely8.cicely.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, Bernd Walter wrote: > XFS is a nice fs but I don't beleave it can come near the performance > of a softupdated FFS. HSM does not sound to be very fast by principle > but it's usefull to have a really fast FS at first stage if the > stagedimensions are selected properly. The next point is that I found > FFS with softupdates idealy for writing MOs if you don't want to use a > streaming method. I wasn't talking about XFS. http://oss.sgi.com/projects/openvault/ -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message