From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Aug 22 15:42:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA14789 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 15:42:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA14783 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 15:42:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA26221; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 16:41:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199808222241.QAA26221@lariat.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.44 (Beta) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 16:41:32 -0600 To: Gregory Sutter , chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Remark from Nick Petreley In-Reply-To: <19980822135700.J924@notabene.zer0.org> References: <199808221921.NAA24991@lariat.lariat.org> <199808221921.NAA24991@lariat.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 01:57 PM 8/22/98 -0700, Gregory Sutter wrote: >Brett, > >_Your_ previous comments on Stallman, more than anyone else on these >lists (that I've heard from), are the ones which I would consider >closest to Petreley's statement above. Practice what you preach. I do, and always have. It is the Linux zealots who interpret ANY remark that critiques the "Holy GPL," or explains the actual intent behind it, as sacriligious. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message