From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 22 13:14:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0A816A40F for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DB813C44E for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from ap-h.matik.com.br (ap-h.matik.com.br [200.152.83.36]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBMDEgDK027405 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:14:42 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:15:51 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <000801c723bb$efc2b540$260ba8c0@wii.wintecind.com> <200612220259.kBM2xYxc019408@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> <200612221343.21237.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200612221343.21237.lofi@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612221015.51709.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:14:45 -0000 On Friday 22 December 2006 09:43, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 22. December 2006 03:59, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > spork@bway.net writes: > > >-5.x was never really for production use, in the same way 3.x never > > >was. > > > > Why do people continue to say this? > > Because everybody knows that odd numbered releases aren't stable. Just li= ke > .0 and .1 releases are rushed out the door after a few months of mad > hackfest and patches being rushed back and forth on kernel.org. Smirk. man, if that really is so then it has an easy solution, don't make 7. but m= ake=20 8. ... :) but the better "believe" would be in better work instead of blaming odd=20 release numbers =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br