From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 17 10:21:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A613A106566C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net (relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FD58FC18 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:21:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoEIAGEj+01UXeb6/2dsb2JhbABSmCaOSHeIdZ9lnzeGJwSWPYsf Received: from outmx05.plus.net ([84.93.230.250]) by relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2011 10:52:23 +0100 Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1QXViw-0008RS-LF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:52:22 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QXViv-0008bg-Ar for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:52:21 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:52:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201106171052.21232.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Odd behaviour with "portmaster -r gnutls" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:21:28 -0000 =46rom /usr/ports/UPDATING =2D---------------------------------------------------------- 20110605: AFFECTS: users of security/gnutls and any port that depends on it AUTHOR: novel@FreeBSD.org gnutls has been updated to 2.12.6.1 and all shared libraries' versions=20 have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on gnutls. Do something like: portupgrade -rf gnutls portmaster -r gnutls =2D---------------------------------------------------------- "pkg_info -Rx gnutls" shows that gnutls is required by 92 of my=20 installed ports so before running "portmaster -a" I duly=20 ran "portmaster -r gnutls". This ran without any errors but only 4=20 ports were updated... curlew:/root# portmaster -r gnutls [snip] =3D=3D=3D>>> Done displaying pkg-message files The following actions were performed: Re-installation of GeoIP-1.4.7 Upgrade of python26-2.6.6_1 to python26-2.6.7 Upgrade of gnutls-2.8.6_2 to gnutls-2.12.6.1_1 Upgrade of wireshark-1.4.6 to wireshark-1.4.7_1 curlew:/root# Should I worry about this huge discrepancy? I haven't got round to=20 running "portmaster -a" yet and I haven't come across any problems so=20 far, apart from having to add an entry for libgnutls.so.40=20 in /etc/libmap.conf to keep cups happy. "pkg_version -vL=3D" shows that 70 ports are due for updating, only some=20 of these depend on gnutls so even after running "portmaster -a" there=20 will be a considerable number of ports depending on gnutls which will=20 not have been updated. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke