Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:52:21 +0100 From: Mike Clarke <jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Odd behaviour with "portmaster -r gnutls" Message-ID: <201106171052.21232.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=46rom /usr/ports/UPDATING =2D---------------------------------------------------------- 20110605: AFFECTS: users of security/gnutls and any port that depends on it AUTHOR: novel@FreeBSD.org gnutls has been updated to 2.12.6.1 and all shared libraries' versions=20 have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on gnutls. Do something like: portupgrade -rf gnutls portmaster -r gnutls =2D---------------------------------------------------------- "pkg_info -Rx gnutls" shows that gnutls is required by 92 of my=20 installed ports so before running "portmaster -a" I duly=20 ran "portmaster -r gnutls". This ran without any errors but only 4=20 ports were updated... curlew:/root# portmaster -r gnutls [snip] =3D=3D=3D>>> Done displaying pkg-message files The following actions were performed: Re-installation of GeoIP-1.4.7 Upgrade of python26-2.6.6_1 to python26-2.6.7 Upgrade of gnutls-2.8.6_2 to gnutls-2.12.6.1_1 Upgrade of wireshark-1.4.6 to wireshark-1.4.7_1 curlew:/root# Should I worry about this huge discrepancy? I haven't got round to=20 running "portmaster -a" yet and I haven't come across any problems so=20 far, apart from having to add an entry for libgnutls.so.40=20 in /etc/libmap.conf to keep cups happy. "pkg_version -vL=3D" shows that 70 ports are due for updating, only some=20 of these depend on gnutls so even after running "portmaster -a" there=20 will be a considerable number of ports depending on gnutls which will=20 not have been updated. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106171052.21232.jmc-freebsd2>