From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Mar 17 16:29:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A77F37B718; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:29:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2I0TD896802; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:29:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:29:13 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103180029.f2I0TD896802@earth.backplane.com> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.ORG (John Baldwin), arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal for the CPU interrupt API References: <200103172342.PAA59546@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :The XXX is more than likely with regards to the ``I think if you are...'' :part of the comment. (And it is wrong about that as well, you need to :use most of the interrupts, even when using the dmac, to deal with things :like DMA underruns and overruns.) : :Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net The point is that it's an eye catcher. "Hey, maybe someone should look at this at some point, it may not be doing the right thing or may not have all the functionality it should or, hey, it could even be just plain broken and the only thing preventing the system from shredding itself is luck!". -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message