From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 21:40:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FED16A4CE; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:40:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0C443D55; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.0.34] (adsl-67-119-74-222.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [67.119.74.222]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3ELebLS025077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:40:37 -0700 Message-ID: <425EE2BE.8060503@root.org> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:38:06 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Wemm References: <200504091700.j39H0H5X060998@repoman.freebsd.org> <200504141402.36352.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <86d5sxxfm4.fsf@xps.des.no> <200504141416.50884.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200504141416.50884.peter@wemm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: John Baldwin cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:40:51 -0000 Peter Wemm wrote: > On Thursday 14 April 2005 01:33 pm, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > >>John Baldwin writes: >> >>>On Thursday 14 April 2005 01:37 pm, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>> >>>>Peter Wemm writes: >>>> >>>>>[local apic timer] makes mixed mode and the entire problem set >>>>>disappear. >>>> >>>>No, it doesn't. >>> >>>Actually, it does (with lapic timer we no longer use IRQ0). >> >>Empirical evidence says it doesn't... >> >>DES > > It had better not, because the code is going away..... > > -Peter While we all appreciate a droll, rambling conversation with no specifics, how about you help us out by backing up your statement, DES? -- Nate