From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 06:21:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052FA16A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from destiny.chrononomicon.com (mail.chrononomicon.com [65.193.73.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9515143D1F for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:21:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (destiny.chrononomicon.com [192.168.1.42]) by destiny.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4761FDFF; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:20:45 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6EECCF67-8255-11D8-BA06-000A956D2452@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:20:45 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) cc: Kent Stewart Subject: portupgrade problem w/ dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:21:15 -0000 After doing a make install on openssl and then a portupgrade -f portupgrade, here's what I ran... server# pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database server# portsdb -Uu Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. Done. done [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 10657 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000....... ..6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000...... ..... done] server# pkdgdb -F pkdgdb: Command not found. server# pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database server# This was what was happening after my previous selection of the portupgrade as a dependency using tab completion (it wouldn't allow openssl with tab completion); no errors seemed to show up afterwards. How can I tell that the link/dependency is properly fixed with portupgrade now, or does the above show it's okay? I don't know if now portupgrade has a circular dependency or not... :-( (below was the exchange that started my problem in the first place and prompted me to send to the list) I'd think that the "command failed" part meant nothing was changed?...below was what prompted the question, above is the output after installing openssl and going portupgrade -f portupgrade, sorry for the out-of-sequence-of-events-posting :-) **** server# pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 -> openssl-0.9.7d (security/openssl): New dependency? (? to help): ? [Enter] to skip, [Ctrl]+[D] to delete, [.][Enter] to abort, [Tab] to complete New dependency? (? to help): portupgrade-20040325_1 Fixed. (-> portupgrade-20040325_1) Cyclic dependencies: portupgrade-20040325_1 -> (portupgrade-20040325_1) Unlink portupgrade-20040325_1 -> portupgrade-20040325_1 ? [yes] Command failed [exit code 1]: "grep -v \"^portupgrade\\\\-20040325_1\\\$\" < /var/db/pkg/portupgrade-20040325_1/+REQUIRED_BY > /tmp/+REQUIRED_BY82988.0" server# ***** Thanks, -Bart