From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Dec 3 11:35:33 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 3 11:35:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from relay1.intercom.es (relay1.intercom.es [212.66.160.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B738B37B400 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 11:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from lix.intercom.es (root@lix.intercom.es [212.66.160.2]) by relay1.intercom.es (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB3JUjK12519; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:30:45 +0100 Received: from intercom.es (iv1-21.intercom.es [212.66.168.21]) by lix.intercom.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA32118; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:21:36 +0100 Received: (from megarcia@localhost) by intercom.es (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eB2HTvS01391; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:29:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from megarcia) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:29:57 +0100 From: Manuel Enrique Garcia Cuesta To: Joe Oliveiro Cc: john@T-F-I.freeserve.co.uk, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bpf enabled in default kernel? Message-ID: <20001202182957.A1327@ilex.kicelo.org> References: <4e8i2t0mrjf4e0rsautrm5sepgq1oq1r7q@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG === Joe Oliveiro escribia (Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 12:16:20PM -0500): > > pseudo-device bpfilter 1 #Berkeley packet filter > is enabled by default in my GENERIC kernel configurations, atleast in > 3.5-s they are. > > pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter > > unser 4.x, it appears to be enabled by default in the GENERIC kernel > configuration also. > > Whether the system by default uses these is a different story. > > I believe the doc at http://people.freebsd.org/~jkb/howto.html is slightly outdated, bpf not enabled by default was the norm until 3.something, if I recall correctly. Manuel Garcia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message