From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 11:50:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596B316A4D0 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:50:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B56E43D1D for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:50:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i88BoS14079637 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:50:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i88BoSUO079636; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:50:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:50:28 GMT Message-Id: <200409081150.i88BoSUO079636@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Ruslan Ermilov Subject: Re: kern/71474: route lookup does not skip interfaces marked down X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruslan Ermilov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:50:28 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/71474; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Thomas Quinot Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/71474: route lookup does not skip interfaces marked down Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:46:54 +0300 On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:09:39PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote: > * Ruslan Ermilov, 2004-09-08 : > > > This is *not* how I spelled it. Try the above as shown. > > I stand corrected. The command as proposed does work. Unfortunately this > applies only to point-to-point interfaces, not in the case where a > specific next-hop address is required. > But your test case only applies to P2P interfaces, when both ends of two P2P interfaces share the same IP address. I'd call this a misconfiguration. I do not see how this could apply to broadcast interfaces. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer