From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Oct 26 00:14:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D8645C4C1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:14:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@proulx.com) Received: from havoc.proulx.com (havoc.proulx.com [96.88.95.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CKFgq6mzmz4hjH for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@proulx.com) Received: from joseki.proulx.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86303A5 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:14:12 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proulx.com; s=dkim2048; t=1603671252; bh=i7RgjXUHDFpKT7sHDxvuEbcwFP7OTb//1WAEn/zOwpI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dtc1xvGKsuvB2MXcywP/qmKwF4VZwiCSykLqwWHYakUn5P2Jj9BwKoP/uXaWblVlj bWW8t6ND6F3G5sI9Z2Z1f44qJDZp09csisnYY25AZcl5IA/piH5vH8zRIMSJ+GiwhC bQFVqJIm3qunNb3VWzkoFTWNDgDqWXZCPlMRCpv6oyA7XWsgihZ0klRW9aV2IF0QY6 UsG+WkF9GQN/69ergYKc6A0GL3uRNXvCffpRbOl2f9of6o+fIIWUu9rpEHIhJPrxZ/ fNEg6s6w9PUjdlkXMXiR0uIPqhTGN3EjlWcyYhzYiXGgZITpppeVjN58mZKO9dIyZe ttaTh2AGr0TlQ== Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CFD21144 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:14:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 618CA2DC9D; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:14:12 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:14:12 -0600 From: Bob Proulx To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ? Message-ID: <20201025180627278760588@bob.proulx.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org> <20201025065025.6a13dc89@archlinux> <24469.26288.47199.882303@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20201025135437.35b592a5@archlinux> <20201025225215.65cfca64@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201025225215.65cfca64@archlinux> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CKFgq6mzmz4hjH X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=proulx.com header.s=dkim2048 header.b=dtc1xvGK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=proulx.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@proulx.com designates 96.88.95.61 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bob@proulx.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.45 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[proulx.com:s=dkim2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[proulx.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[proulx.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.47)[-0.471]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:96.64.0.0/11, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:14:17 -0000 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >Please explain the risk(s) associate with antistatic wrist straps. > > IMO it's a risk for a human being to wear an antistatic wrist strap, > when getting in touch with gear that is connected to the mains. ESD wrist straps have a resistor in series to prevent exactly this problem from occurring. It's on the order of a 1 M ohm value. This protects the wearer in the event they touch live AC mains. (Meanwhile... I always preferred the heel straps myself.) Bob