From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 16 16:21:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E4337B69D for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:21:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e4GNs7v20839; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 16:54:07 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Brian Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP Question! Message-ID: <20000516165407.C19309@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from brian@utrave.org on Tue, May 16, 2000 at 04:27:47PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Brian [000516 16:03] wrote: > > I was just wondering if FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE would have better > SMP Support than 3.4-STABLE or if there isn't any difference > in the code between these versions? Any information on this > would greatly be appreciated! The changes just went in last night. :) The 4.0-stable snapshots generated tonight will have signifigant changes to SMP. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message