Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:49:19 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Message-ID: <bug-239682-21738-UMShPWI5vR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239682 --- Comment #8 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #7) > much easier to fix KLEE dependency to llvm80 instead of LLVM_DEFAULT. The patch in review D21172 already does. Unless the port supports only one LLVM version (e.g., llvm80 but not llvm70, llvm60) then using LLVM_DEFAULT is kinda OK if you're willing to support. If we do end up with USES=llvm it'd be nice to have something more than version range checks. Alternatively, library support (e.g., libclang from devel/llvm*, libatomic from lang/gcc*) can be added into USES=compiler after throwing out unused cruft. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239682-21738-UMShPWI5vR>