From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 17 01:40:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BE316A47B for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2967A43D5D for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:40:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k9H1eOae011465 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:40:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k9H1eOFm011464; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:40:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:40:24 GMT Message-Id: <200610170140.k9H1eOFm011464@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Bruce Evans Cc: Subject: Re: kern/104436: [PATCH] sys/sem.h should include sys/types.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce Evans List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:40:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/104436; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Evans To: John Baldwin Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Cheng-Lung Sung , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/104436: [PATCH] sys/sem.h should include sys/types.h Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:39:09 +1000 (EST) [This is still being sent to too many mailing lists since I don't know which ones it should go to except gnats.] On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, John Baldwin wrote: >> Including sys/types.h would add lots of namespace pollution which >> sys/ipc.h and sys/sem.h are trying hard to avoid. sem.h is trying too >> hard -- POSIX requires it to declare time_t (and pid_t, key_t and size_t, >> which it already declares). > > Is this better? > > Index: sem.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/sys/sem.h,v > retrieving revision 1.29 > diff -c -r1.29 sem.h > *** sem.h 17 Nov 2004 13:12:06 -0000 1.29 > --- sem.h 16 Oct 2006 18:30:05 -0000 > *************** > *** 111,116 **** > --- 111,121 ---- > #define _SIZE_T_DECLARED > #endif > > + #ifndef _TIME_T_DECLARED > + typedef __time_t time_t; > + #define _TIME_T_DECLARED > + #endif > + > #ifndef _PID_T_DECLARED > typedef __pid_t pid_t; > #define _PID_T_DECLARED > > (it looks like pid_t should be before size_t in sem.h btw) Good. (I didn't check if there are any other missing typedefs.) Please commit. The old typedefs also have non-KNF whitespace. sys/ipc.h is better. Bruce