From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 11:40:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4735937B40B for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0873943F3F for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:40:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5HIeM1f078476; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:40:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h5HIeMZD078475; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:40:22 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h5HIbxHh002133; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:37:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200306171837.h5HIbxHh002133@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Greg Lewis In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:14:08 MDT." <20030617171408.GA7693@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:37:59 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTM - any users left? X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:40:25 -0000 Greg Lewis writes: > I have a Perl script (ambitiously called ctmup :) to automate the > downloading and installing of CTM deltas via FTP (even though I could > use CVSup, CTM was faster). I used this up until a short time before > I became a committer (I needed CVS diff :), although I was never > subscribed to the email updates. > > So, I concur that not everybody who uses ctm is subscribed to the > email updates, FWIW. All this is adding up to overwhelming evidence for CTM being perfectly home as a port, no? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH