From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 23 16: 9:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6362737B400; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:09:28 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g2O09RX72516; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:09:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:09:27 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200203240009.g2O09RX72516@apollo.backplane.com> To: "David O'Brien" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: turning off malloc's AJ by default References: <20020323155500.A18666@dragon.nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If I remember correctly, it was the plan all along that releases would not have AJ turned on by default. The real question is: should the patch stay in after the release is rolled? Has the AJ default outlived its usefulness in general? -Matt Matthew Dillon :The RE's are wanting to ship 5.0 DP#1 w/this patch applied. :If having 'AJ' by default is deemed not useful (by being removed from the :DP), it sounds like we should just turn it off. : :Unless there is strong objection, I plan on committing this. : :Index: malloc.c :=================================================================== :RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c,v :retrieving revision 1.66 :diff -u -u -1 -r1.66 malloc.c :--- malloc.c 22 Mar 2002 21:53:10 -0000 1.66 :+++ malloc.c 23 Mar 2002 23:52:40 -0000 :@@ -223,3 +223,3 @@ : /* Abort(), user doesn't handle problems. */ :-static int malloc_abort = 1; :+static int malloc_abort; : :@@ -244,3 +244,3 @@ : /* junk fill ? */ :-static int malloc_junk = 1; :+static int malloc_junk; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message