From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 07:00:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E2D3E7A3A for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 07:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bkj3c2F3rz4XGd for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 07:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id x2so9893803ilm.0 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 00:00:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=qG/CfsONp8c00XsB3AnA0j96Fake5W8qv5brKJgr3Rs=; b=ag5Fl7si/wrIinV8RWpdXyHdaeRtj6E4ENfp5yhHgl0/bTq3oSFX4wpXhTguXNSTBY +u2tfGpBeQqHrBIBA/RD6e3FTqTJb/eUJBrw3/UETXa6NFS0UY1kIuK7QEgxYEqf1aZC n8WR5A170DGnCkMZEPweREq+hjwwsFEYe7PEIqkumNZjjEd83aLeAPSOz7EXvzUfUGW8 NnY4YZshYI8fPdjU3Kv+7vj7KGJOPYRzLFliILEOTcEZdwIDvSKYIHVphYc2NsC7WB06 W1I9mP/3PjrHCAtBmTc5BJXaEPG+ZA1gVH3Z7xzO8HA+g9xzo8es4itCpdyT/FRi/89E nZbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533EYmsrhsHKq4MzN+FxG/zbr1+2233H/oJS1DWFd6CZUYowz9PP 8rRdeOPJwII1pC6iP6qoFu4M8NGCm3Wryt9W5wKXMADivBDqJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2HNY9ZJF3qwUgzQvrJR7VU7FIZGVFI1syemApl+j2MYN9PKtyjwjLW9UN8XzTKDlfybDsfOF/WWK2ytfN9Fc= X-Received: by 2002:a92:7305:: with SMTP id o5mr13870887ilc.146.1599375626998; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 00:00:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:a908:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 00:00:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20200905230416.56a9810dae8736dc9a7839bd@j.email.ne.jp> From: grarpamp Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 03:00:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is pkg site forbidden by brower? To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bkj3c2F3rz4XGd X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.91 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.05)[-1.048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.045]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::142:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.18)[0.183]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 07:00:29 -0000 On 9/6/20, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 8:04 PM Yoshihiro Ota wrote: >> Is "403 Forbidden" an intended response for a brower access to >> http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:12:i386/ nowdays? >> >> I used to see available packages with a brower and decided which one to >> use. Some more people have noted this change as breaking tool scripts, etc. And useful meta files are unfortunately now invisible: packagesite.txz, meta.txz, pkg.txz, pkg.txz.sig If someone want to block the '/.../All/' dir full of pkgs, maybe, but do not block any other part of the hier. >> How can I find distributions like "latest", "release_X", etc? Yes, there does not appear to be any docs enumerating all the available live names for use in PACKAGESITE url. Reopening the above dirs would be self documenting. The name for the term in position of /${ABI}//All/... might be "REPOSITORY_ROOT" or "repo-path" or simply "repository", but it does not seem defined for users in pkg or pkg.conf manpages. "distribution" is unlikely the correct term, "branch" might be a useful connotation regarding ports source tree. > Does https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?jailname=121amd64 have what you > want? Those names don't correspond 1:1 to anything on pkg.freebsd.org. > I can't believe that there is no way to see a log of failed builds, > but I can only see the new failures and no information on previous builds. Pkg buildlogs are a separate issue. They should be available for browsing, same as kernel, base...