From owner-freebsd-net Tue May 12 07:23:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA09854 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 May 1998 07:23:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA08734; Tue, 12 May 1998 07:19:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from yggdrasil.ifi.uio.no (2602@yggdrasil.ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.182]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id QAA18890; Tue, 12 May 1998 16:19:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from dag-erli@localhost) by yggdrasil.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 12 May 1998 16:19:28 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD References: <155.894982274@time.cdrom.com> Organization: Gutteklubben Terrasse / KRST / PUMS / YASMW X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ X-Stop-Spam: http://www.cauce.org From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Date: 12 May 1998 16:19:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Tue, 12 May 1998 07:11:14 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: > > So how do you feel about integrating the INRIA IPv6 stack into FreeBSD > > CURRENT? > Erm, unfortunately, the WIDE project in Japan recently approached us > (well, Mike, myself and DG at any rate) with essentially the exact > same proposal and now we're seriously stuck trying to figure out what > to do. Obviously there can't be TWO IPv6 implementations in -current, > so which to choose? :-( Hmm... both? shouldn't really be too difficult as long as you don't try to compile a kernel with both of them together. -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message