From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 11 16:26:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from krycek.zoominternet.net (krycek.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DA5A37B424 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 16:26:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmmiller@cvzoom.net) Received: (qmail 17517 invoked from network); 11 May 2001 23:24:13 -0000 Received: from acs-24-154-37-140.zoominternet.net (HELO cvzoom.net) (24.154.37.140) by krycek.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 11 May 2001 23:24:13 -0000 Message-ID: <3AFC7509.E0DAFE66@cvzoom.net> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 19:26:01 -0400 From: Donn Miller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lamont Granquist Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fat32 slower than dogshit? References: <20010511151056.J15049-100000@warez.scriptkiddie.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Lamont Granquist wrote: > > Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is > in the first place. But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition > using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated > 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30 times slower than an > untar on a UFS partition. That sounds about right. This is one of many reasons I don't run WinDOS anymore. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message