Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:47:47 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> To: Paul Koch <paul.koch@statseeker.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Subject: Re: Is it safe to compile multiple ports at the same time ? Message-ID: <20060517064747.GC42089@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <200605171615.29000.paul.koch@statseeker.com> References: <200605171353.37745.paul.koch@statseeker.com> <200605171508.07228.paul.koch@statseeker.com> <20060517060026.GA40653@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <200605171615.29000.paul.koch@statseeker.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:15:28PM +1000, Paul Koch wrote:
[...]
> Yep, in your example above, it won't be any faster. But what if I want=
=20
> to do something like:
>=20
> port A depends on Q R S T X
> port B depends on D E F G X
>=20
> then lots of simultaneous building can occur until they both hit port X.
>=20
Agreed.
--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
--FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFEascTFw6SP/bBpCARAkLbAKCbLZjkJw4jEDFJEhjLMhMssRPPKACfWdpU
lYx5xWzHQBuGTXVTWKaSU2Y=
=66yS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060517064747.GC42089>