From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 15:38:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BA5106564A for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1408A8FC15 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFDA17104; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m39FcE1t045301; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:38:15 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Marcel Moolenaar From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:36:17 MST." Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:38:14 +0000 Message-ID: <45300.1207755494@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: arch@freebsd.org, John E Hein Subject: Re: sync/async [was: Re: tt_ioctl] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:38:17 -0000 In message , Marcel Moolenaar wri tes: >I think the complexity or problems stem from the fact that >there's a single driver. With scc(4) the design is such that >the driving is left to subordinate drivers like uart(4) and >the only thing that scc(4) does is arbitration. Yeah, we have the same thing over at the ppbus. I remember talking with Warner about making this a facility in newbus instead, but I think we had too much beer and too little time :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.