Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:11:10 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        Mark Nipper <nipsy@tamu.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SCSI devices settling and illegal request
Message-ID:  <15132.9118.863339.708828@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010604165948.A18399@arrakis.tamu.edu>
References:  <15132.765.786027.851646@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20010604165948.A18399@arrakis.tamu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Mark Nipper writes:
 > ---
 > 
 > 	Whoohoo.  So will a 3Com 905C-TX work in this thing?
 > That's all I need that NCR 53C875 card for...


Yes.  And, in fact, 3com (and intel etherexpress pro) cards are
generally a better choice than tulip based nics because they can do
byte-aligned DMA, whereas the tulip 21x4x chip can do only
word-aligned DMA.  Because ethernet headers are 14-bytes, this means
all incoming frames must be copied to properly (mis)aligned mbufs on
alpha, which isn't terribly efficient.

Drew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15132.9118.863339.708828>