From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 04:42:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621AC16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6F8543D46 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:42:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 62451 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2006 04:42:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index; b=byy3LgNbTpiUinjksfhcCBb965IvS0z8H2dBpOi+SLqrUbvDRtR7kYy5xvjqKEI8D4az+8SpCryO+KAcLRPhSOiS67Lx69ip/TRl83SgIjmPbJsqGSdhE1Qh79K0tE2ysG/WY4aWhEhoNqsMS87avs0KsY2QlWdT3NnYtiFzqZw= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2006 04:42:40 -0000 From: "Tamouh H." To: Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 23:42:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <4416483E.70600@ywave.com> Thread-Index: AcZHIOE8kU53854eT5yfWaKs3fkD9QAAHzTA Message-Id: <20060314044240.C6F8543D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: how does a system come up if you disable background fsck ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:42:41 -0000 =20 >=20 > Ensel Sharon wrote: > > I have disabled background fsck in my /etc/rc.conf with: > >=20 > > background_fsck=3D"no" > >=20 > > But I am curious - what does this mean for the system if the system=20 > > crashes ? > >=20 > > Does this mean that the system will wait for all non root=20 > partitions=20 > > to fully fsck before coming up into multi-user mode ? > >=20 > > OR > >=20 > > Does it mean the system will boot up quickly into=20 > multi-user mode, but=20 > > the non-root partitions will just not be mounted and/or=20 > usable until I=20 > > fsck them by hand ? > >=20 > > thanks. >=20 > The former, as I can say with ample experience this morning.=20 > (stupid USB > panic) >=20 > HTH, > Micah I find both ways useless. If fsck background starts after a crash it = literally slows down the machine to a halt rendering it unusable. If enable fsck to check the system prior to mounting device, it will = take at least 15-30 minutes for it to complete (in the event of a hard = crash). Which also translates to a downtime. disabling fsck on the long run is a bad choice too as eventually the = system files will become corrupt beyond repair. What is the solution here ? Thx, Tamouh