From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Nov 18 04:49:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4EF2E1A4B; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CbVhF5yKkz4fGP; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id f18so338719pgi.8; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:49:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=lWgkZLoGYC/X87gAddC5fWYbihrFilTTEXGoskKfDeA=; b=jfcp2/2OM/OkrJPs8fAEldQ1QM7ircIdbYHAglFVW1ktsyJyI0yrLPwTdjcmyfcdA9 g3f3WFS0H9yt/3dLEsDskLfp+vuLuLslTJXRa7kH9kerTDkcLFxGJnltgji15tDYjjvO unRDv6C17xdrVpPT2huMvFPSEYAmleftAjAbvRAE4YnQjT7q/0RyabHQdz8ChP9rFa6L OV28+Ws3cgbN+GaC4BLbTHOtyBGgOeXn5cf6qXZ7GFsqBZZxBOn0/6WSjxfVHdZJKa+R T2TY54zvQsvXIMKmC0eXgvThWDEoPMEddgfYJJ1ceiu2O+iZakkzTAV13WBIGTOTe7jB B8oA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=lWgkZLoGYC/X87gAddC5fWYbihrFilTTEXGoskKfDeA=; b=ixZRE2/V7+M+r58LEvTU9CBuC4L+W+Qx0Rzjh1Ny4XT5o+MelHNJpqY2Bpri3ZFJi/ ImrGEe8ar5WUsjWQvqT57Y+eq4A515I71VhRMzJz0yj+NnMSig+uoohf+QwzKo+RJ8pa mn8trg7Zt+EQ5RYQmnaNK0x+HMWzr8wYv3jkzVJ4t/qktlomXRp5xL7J8E42h2bAeEEq 5vDiIXgXqST98DC4ym/zoLGyMLpLHllCokv2bvNjX2ci/Ka0s4BmkxJerzpEv+XBVY+5 CrJc4P+NCNjg7eQ+6AlL9M6DYr4qRqpO8Q7m5vlyPBputoWbb00850ccLQf9qiSTHXH8 6ZZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QJUpYYgsjDz3RblH4oGcUK2OLsXr+qdbU7Ad3lbjLT9oGns+X gF/CWpl1g21Hn5ISkfjwDkwAzZ0vk/o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrEZ0fe5ek01IS2g2WaOgW/C/1oy6poTP7Kn4tuA2WoKXJbd5rIFXbxzraToPJ/VKPJ27Vew== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2a83:: with SMTP id q125mr6361026pgq.84.1605674940545; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([210.108.244.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm22969285pfh.94.2020.11.17.20.48.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:48:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:48:57 +0900 From: YongHyeon PYUN To: Carsten =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E4cker?= Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , Kristof Provost , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with checksum offloading on RPi3 (PF + Jails involved) Message-ID: <20201118044857.GA1974@michelle> References: <20201029213622.GM31099@funkthat.com> <55713894-A896-4F12-ABB9-93DFEB2F16B9@FreeBSD.org> <20201103045215.GA2524@michelle> <46d08198-530c-cb4b-efa8-4edaf89471c1@selasky.org> <4dfaa9a3-c085-8466-a6e4-19f988b5ed3d@selasky.org> <20201116011910.GB1941@michelle> <1245cbe5-9d2f-4808-f989-569ae7d57a8a@gmx.de> <20201117030406.GA45158@michelle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CbVhF5yKkz4fGP X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=jfcp2/2O; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pyunyh@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::532 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pyunyh@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmx.de]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::532:from]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::532:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::532:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm,freebsd-hackers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:49:02 -0000 On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 05:38:38AM +0100, Carsten Bäcker wrote: [...] > i attached another set of log-files containing the output of the test > using nping. > The ICMP port unreachable message appeared in each case, but the paket > loss changed to 100%. That came from 3rd nping test with --badsum option and that's normal. If I read attached log-files correctly all worked as expected. I don't know what pf rulesets you used. Did you use the same pf ruleset + jail with patched smsc(4)? If you didn't yet could you test it again and let me know nping output?