From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 00:48:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEF816A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:48:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E72843D48 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: from [64.62.253.84] (helo=m) by beer.ux6.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1DCS8U-000Nup-J8; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:48:15 -0800 From: "Mikhail P." To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, estover@nativenerds.com Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:48:00 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1111192552.1768.15.camel@red.nativenerds.com> In-Reply-To: <1111192552.1768.15.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503190048.00790.miha@ghuug.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "beer.ux6.net", hasmessagelabel similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.I>> knowing the limitations of that combination I am wondering what you > >FreeBSD'sMTA MDA > set ups. Although with a some research on the net I have found If you use qmail > +NIS or LDAP what was your experience like when replacing sendmail with > qmail on FreeBSD? Any response with be greatly appreciated. > > PS Any ideas on filtering inappropriate content from emails aside from > procmail? [...] Content analysis details: (-5.9 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: A quick question X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:48:20 -0000 On Saturday 19 March 2005 00:35, Ed Stover wrote: > I am in the process of designing a server to be used as a "pop toaster" > type deal. Basically, I have experience with sendmail and imap-uw but > knowing the limitations of that combination I am wondering what you > FreeBSD-ISP guys & gals use as your combinations on your high traffic > environments. Also, what is your opinion on using OpenLDAP vs FreeBSD's > built in NIS infrastructure in combination with those other your MTA MDA > set ups. Although with a some research on the net I have found that ISPs > and other large organization are drifting toward qmail. If you use qmail > +NIS or LDAP what was your experience like when replacing sendmail with > qmail on FreeBSD? Any response with be greatly appreciated. > > PS Any ideas on filtering inappropriate content from emails aside from > procmail? We used qmail + vpopmail + MySQL setup in the past, but switched to Exim + MySQL setup about a year ago. Current setup consists of classic Exim + Courier (pop[s]/imap[s]) + MySQL + ClamAV + SpamAssassin combo. Exim and Courier-Imap both use MySQL. Exim integrates very well and easily with SpamAssassin and ClamAV for filtering purposes. regards, M.