From owner-cvs-all Thu Jan 27 12:53:56 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from green.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CF715743; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 12:53:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by green.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06315; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:53:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: green.dyndns.org: green owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:53:26 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Yoshinobu Inoue Cc: shin@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 in6.c In-Reply-To: <20000128025601A.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: > > be a problem to have both. It would be a bad idea to just plain have 4.0 > > go out without the IPv6 firewall, even if that said firewall was missing > > features of the IPv4 one. I would work on merging the features of the IPv4 > > ipfw into the ipfw6 after 4.0. What do you think? > > To think about the time left, I think the only possible way is > just merge KAME/FreeBSD3.4 ipfw6. (Once I was almost merging.) > But that is actually based on FreeBSD22x ipfw, so somewhat old. > It doesn't support even LKM. That is what I meant :) > > If you think even such ipfw6 is OK, then I'll try re-merging > it. (ipfw6 related ifdef's are left as is, so re-enabling it > won't be too much work.) Go for it! I shouldn't have objected earlier on the basis it wasn't complete yet (updated), since it really has to be here for us to be able to work on. If you could just get ip_fw6.[ch] and ipfw6.[c8] in right now, I'll be happy. I'll certainly work on getting the two merged for 4.1+. Do you think you could add a BUGS section to ipfw6.4, something along the lines of "This version of IPFW was based upon an older codebase than what is in FreeBSD right now. Some features and changes made in IPFW are not in, yet."? > > Yoshinobu Inoue -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message